- Topic
29k Popularity
31k Popularity
143k Popularity
4k Popularity
18k Popularity
- Pin
- 🎉 Hey Gate Square friends! Non-stop perks and endless excitement—our hottest posting reward events are ongoing now! The more you post, the more you win. Don’t miss your exclusive goodies! 🚀
🆘 #Gate 2025 Semi-Year Community Gala# | Square Content Creator TOP 10
Only 1 day left! Your favorite creator is one vote away from TOP 10. Interact on Square to earn Votes—boost them and enter the prize draw. Prizes: iPhone 16 Pro Max, Golden Bull sculpture, Futures Vouchers!
Details 👉 https://www.gate.com/activities/community-vote
1️⃣ #Show My Alpha Points# | Share your Alpha points & gains
Post your - 💙 Gate Square #Gate Blue Challenge# 💙
Show your limitless creativity with Gate Blue!
📅 Event Period
August 11 – 20, 2025
🎯 How to Participate
1. Post your original creation (image / video / hand-drawn art / digital work, etc.) on Gate Square, incorporating Gate’s brand blue or the Gate logo.
2. Include the hashtag #Gate Blue Challenge# in your post title or content.
3. Add a short blessing or message for Gate in your content (e.g., “Wishing Gate Exchange continued success — may the blue shine forever!”).
4. Submissions must be original and comply with community guidelines. Plagiarism or re
The Crypto Assets industry has once again become the focus, this time due to a well-known individual's wealth status causing controversy. Recently, an internationally renowned media organization released a "Crypto Assets Billionaires Index," which details the asset portfolio of a well-known figure in the industry.
According to reports, this person's crypto assets include: approximately 600 Asinda coins (accounting for 63% of the total), nearly 17,000 bitcoins, about 224,000 ethers, and 700,000 Tether coins. At current market prices, their total asset value may approach $24 billion.
However, the situation quickly took a turn. This important figure in the Crypto Assets industry swiftly responded, firmly denying the authenticity of this data. He not only publicly stated that this information was "completely fabricated," but also took legal action, filing a lawsuit against the media that published the report and seeking a court injunction to prevent further dissemination of the relevant information.
This event has once again sparked discussions about the transparency of the Crypto Assets industry. Although the authenticity of the specific figures is disputed, it undoubtedly showcases the immense influence held by certain participants in the industry. At the same time, it highlights the sensitivity of information in the Crypto Assets market and the importance of protecting privacy.
As the legal proceedings unfold, it is widely believed in the industry that the outcome of this dispute could have far-reaching implications for the information disclosure standards in the Crypto Assets industry. Regardless of the lawsuit's outcome, this event will become an important case for discussing the balance between digital asset transparency and individual privacy rights.
At the same time, the Crypto Assets market continues to showcase its unique vitality. Reports indicate that the search popularity of some small coins has reached a nearly five-year high, reflecting investors' sustained interest and attention to this rapidly developing field.