"Debt-as-Financing": Can Hong Kong's RWA Ambitions Succeed?

Intermediate6/10/2025, 1:21:11 AM
Why has the Hong Kong RWA route stagnated? This article deeply analyzes the limitations of "bond issuance as financing" and proposes a new strategic path of returning to infrastructure, laying out offshore markets, and building an Asia-Pacific on-chain asset hub.

In the past few days, the media clash between HashKey and OSL has once again brought the Hong Kong virtual asset ecosystem into the spotlight: 10 licensed trading platforms have been issued licenses, while 8 are still in the queue, yet there are very few that have truly generated traffic and depth. Even more embarrassing is that the much-anticipated RWA (Real World Assets) tokenization has come to a standstill after completing three trial transactions; most licensed platforms can only rely on OTC business to make ends meet, but their income is barely enough.

The licensing dividends have yet to be realized, and product innovation is struggling to make progress. The RWA route in Hong Kong is facing a collective interrogation of “where to go from here”. Could this be a failed new financial pilot?


(ChatGPT raw image)

Core conclusion first: Hong Kong’s current RWA experiment will not “fail”, but if it continues to stay in the single-line thinking of “issuing bonds = financing”, it will inevitably be squeezed from both sides by Wall Street’s standardization wave and Southeast Asia’s multi-layered capital network. The only way out is to return to infrastructure, deepen the institutional market, amplify offshore advantages, and shape an Asia-Pacific on-chain asset hub.

01 First, look at the curve: the United States is steadily climbing, while Hong Kong is passively maturing.

  1. Wall Street (T-RWA Path): From Bitcoin Spot ETF → Tokenization of US Treasuries → Tokenization of Bank Deposits → Tokenization of Money Market Funds → Stablecoins → Tokenization of US Stocks. All centered around “cost reduction and efficiency improvement + not touching the existing stock,” almost not involving incremental financing and non-standard products.
  2. Hong Kong Curve: Skipping the standardization phase, three non-standard corporate bonds were issued directly in the sandbox, pushed into the spotlight by technology companies and brokers. The maturing RWA market currently lacks secondary liquidity, with additional issuances halted, having slid to the peak of expected inflation.

Pain Point Manufacturing:
· Narrow asset side - only accommodates qualified new energy bonds, ignoring cash flow assets such as logistics warehousing, AI computing centers, and precious metal mines.
· High cost of funds - USD cost 10%+, project starting at 30 million USD, discouraging small and medium enterprises;
· Infrastructure shortage - public chains, custody, and Oracles rely solely on a single alliance chain;
· Market education is lacking - The asset side and the funding side have not yet completed market education, and third-party institutions such as brokers, auditors, and market makers are not yet systematic. Meanwhile, the RWA business of licensed trading platforms has not yet started, and is primarily sustained by OTC.

02 Why can’t “Copying Wall Street” be replicated?

Although Hong Kong follows Wall Street’s lead, during a recent period of low BTC prices, the net inflow of ETFs in the US was $260 million; meanwhile, during the same period, the subscription and redemption of ETFs in Hong Kong was zero.

Solution (Three Steps)

  1. Assets: Transitioning from a single debt to a diversified pool of “debt + equity + commodities + carbon credits.”
  2. Funding: Establish an offshore RWA mother fund, with HKD stablecoin/Crypto + HKD + USD operating in parallel.
  3. Infrastructure: Public Chain Layer 2 (HashKeyChain or WeBank) + HKD Stablecoin + Compliant Custody, forming a 7×24 settlement network.

03 Offshore Financial Architecture: Mainland Assets × Hong Kong Primary × Overseas Secondary × DeFi Subordinate

Do not be confused and polluted by various information channels; the path to quality assets in the mainland can only follow this offshore financial structure:

  1. Asset securitization - Mainland SPV packaging assets (precious metals, manufacturing, agriculture, AI computing power data centers, logistics and warehousing, etc.);
  2. Primary issuance - licensed brokers in Hong Kong + audit pricing, private placement RWA Fund;
  3. Secondary liquidity - Singapore/Dubai secondary market or ATS market making, USDT/USDC pool acceleration;
  4. Subordinate/DeFi - On-chain AMM, Staking collateral, opening retail traffic.

This multi-tiered capital market structure avoids the bottleneck of single-point regulation, allowing for cross-domain arbitrage of funds and assets, which in turn feeds back into the primary market in Hong Kong, forming a positive cycle.

04 Hong Kong Institutional Market: Debt is just for “withdrawal management”, don’t treat it as “fundraising investment”.

RWA is not just about bond financing, nor is it pre-financing; good asset packages do not lack suitable funding.

  1. The essence of debt is to serve long-term institutional holders; if the asset pool is not sufficiently broad, the secondary market will inevitably be barren.
  2. What is truly lacking is not “people who can sell debt,” but rather quality asset packages that can be “due diligence and penetrable” generated by the combination of brokerage firms and audits.
  3. Licensed trading platforms should transform into a three-in-one model of market making, investment research, and community, rather than waiting for star projects to parachute in.

05 Agricultural RWA: From “Malu Grapes” to Rural Upgrading

The returns on high-value agricultural products are not low, and the policy regulatory tolerance is very high.

  1. Land tenure difficulties → use equity SPV + agricultural REITs to avoid crossing the red line.
  2. High-value crops (wild ginseng, Chinese medicinal materials, agarwood, dried tangerine peel, etc.) + warehouse receipts/purchase long-term agreements → income rights financing.
  3. Rural cultural tourism + landmark brand on-chain → allowing global capital to buy “scenery + returns + ESG.”

Agricultural RWA provides incremental stories, opening a new track of “green finance + rural revitalization” for Hong Kong.

06 Infrastructure Strategy: Create the “Asia-Pacific On-Chain Asset List”

Build RWA infrastructure for Web2.5 using the approach of Web3.0 infrastructure.

· HKD stablecoin - linking to the internationalization of the Renminbi (reserve asset - offshore Renminbi), becoming the settlement anchor for the Hong Kong dollar;

· Layer2 public chain - supporting the tokenization of Hong Kong stocks and RWA infrastructure;

· Licensed Trading Platform Alliance DEX - Establish a liquidity alliance, share market making depth, and bridge Hong Kong stocks with crypto stocks;

· OTC & Custody - Connecting institutional cold wallets, family offices, and offshore funds for financial institutions in Hong Kong;

· DePIN+AI Agent - Abandon the erroneous path of “digitalization - on-chain - tokenization” and directly generate on-chain distributed assets based on infrastructure, forming a traceable distributed asset data network.

07 Future Roadmap: From “Copying Homework” to “Creating Exam Questions”

08 Conclusion: Hong Kong RWA will not fail, but the path needs to be reconstructed.

The failure lies not in the concept, but in the single-threaded “debt issuance-financing logic.” If Hong Kong wishes to maintain its status as a new financial center in the era of RWA, it must upgrade from “replicating Wall Street” to a three-dimensional battlefield of “integrating mainland assets + offshore funds + on-chain infrastructure.” When HKD stablecoins, Layer 2 settlements, and cross-domain ATS take shape, Hong Kong will transform from a “follower” into a “hub for on-chain assets in the Asia-Pacific,” truly completing, deepening, and expanding the RWA narrative.

Statement:

  1. This article is reprinted from [BLOCKBEATS] The copyright belongs to the original author [Ye Kai] If you have any objections to the reprint, please contact Gate Learn TeamThe team will process it as quickly as possible according to the relevant procedures.
  2. Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not constitute any investment advice.
  3. Other language versions of the article are translated by the Gate Learn team, unless otherwise mentioned.GateUnder such circumstances, it is prohibited to copy, disseminate, or plagiarize translated articles.

"Debt-as-Financing": Can Hong Kong's RWA Ambitions Succeed?

Intermediate6/10/2025, 1:21:11 AM
Why has the Hong Kong RWA route stagnated? This article deeply analyzes the limitations of "bond issuance as financing" and proposes a new strategic path of returning to infrastructure, laying out offshore markets, and building an Asia-Pacific on-chain asset hub.

In the past few days, the media clash between HashKey and OSL has once again brought the Hong Kong virtual asset ecosystem into the spotlight: 10 licensed trading platforms have been issued licenses, while 8 are still in the queue, yet there are very few that have truly generated traffic and depth. Even more embarrassing is that the much-anticipated RWA (Real World Assets) tokenization has come to a standstill after completing three trial transactions; most licensed platforms can only rely on OTC business to make ends meet, but their income is barely enough.

The licensing dividends have yet to be realized, and product innovation is struggling to make progress. The RWA route in Hong Kong is facing a collective interrogation of “where to go from here”. Could this be a failed new financial pilot?


(ChatGPT raw image)

Core conclusion first: Hong Kong’s current RWA experiment will not “fail”, but if it continues to stay in the single-line thinking of “issuing bonds = financing”, it will inevitably be squeezed from both sides by Wall Street’s standardization wave and Southeast Asia’s multi-layered capital network. The only way out is to return to infrastructure, deepen the institutional market, amplify offshore advantages, and shape an Asia-Pacific on-chain asset hub.

01 First, look at the curve: the United States is steadily climbing, while Hong Kong is passively maturing.

  1. Wall Street (T-RWA Path): From Bitcoin Spot ETF → Tokenization of US Treasuries → Tokenization of Bank Deposits → Tokenization of Money Market Funds → Stablecoins → Tokenization of US Stocks. All centered around “cost reduction and efficiency improvement + not touching the existing stock,” almost not involving incremental financing and non-standard products.
  2. Hong Kong Curve: Skipping the standardization phase, three non-standard corporate bonds were issued directly in the sandbox, pushed into the spotlight by technology companies and brokers. The maturing RWA market currently lacks secondary liquidity, with additional issuances halted, having slid to the peak of expected inflation.

Pain Point Manufacturing:
· Narrow asset side - only accommodates qualified new energy bonds, ignoring cash flow assets such as logistics warehousing, AI computing centers, and precious metal mines.
· High cost of funds - USD cost 10%+, project starting at 30 million USD, discouraging small and medium enterprises;
· Infrastructure shortage - public chains, custody, and Oracles rely solely on a single alliance chain;
· Market education is lacking - The asset side and the funding side have not yet completed market education, and third-party institutions such as brokers, auditors, and market makers are not yet systematic. Meanwhile, the RWA business of licensed trading platforms has not yet started, and is primarily sustained by OTC.

02 Why can’t “Copying Wall Street” be replicated?

Although Hong Kong follows Wall Street’s lead, during a recent period of low BTC prices, the net inflow of ETFs in the US was $260 million; meanwhile, during the same period, the subscription and redemption of ETFs in Hong Kong was zero.

Solution (Three Steps)

  1. Assets: Transitioning from a single debt to a diversified pool of “debt + equity + commodities + carbon credits.”
  2. Funding: Establish an offshore RWA mother fund, with HKD stablecoin/Crypto + HKD + USD operating in parallel.
  3. Infrastructure: Public Chain Layer 2 (HashKeyChain or WeBank) + HKD Stablecoin + Compliant Custody, forming a 7×24 settlement network.

03 Offshore Financial Architecture: Mainland Assets × Hong Kong Primary × Overseas Secondary × DeFi Subordinate

Do not be confused and polluted by various information channels; the path to quality assets in the mainland can only follow this offshore financial structure:

  1. Asset securitization - Mainland SPV packaging assets (precious metals, manufacturing, agriculture, AI computing power data centers, logistics and warehousing, etc.);
  2. Primary issuance - licensed brokers in Hong Kong + audit pricing, private placement RWA Fund;
  3. Secondary liquidity - Singapore/Dubai secondary market or ATS market making, USDT/USDC pool acceleration;
  4. Subordinate/DeFi - On-chain AMM, Staking collateral, opening retail traffic.

This multi-tiered capital market structure avoids the bottleneck of single-point regulation, allowing for cross-domain arbitrage of funds and assets, which in turn feeds back into the primary market in Hong Kong, forming a positive cycle.

04 Hong Kong Institutional Market: Debt is just for “withdrawal management”, don’t treat it as “fundraising investment”.

RWA is not just about bond financing, nor is it pre-financing; good asset packages do not lack suitable funding.

  1. The essence of debt is to serve long-term institutional holders; if the asset pool is not sufficiently broad, the secondary market will inevitably be barren.
  2. What is truly lacking is not “people who can sell debt,” but rather quality asset packages that can be “due diligence and penetrable” generated by the combination of brokerage firms and audits.
  3. Licensed trading platforms should transform into a three-in-one model of market making, investment research, and community, rather than waiting for star projects to parachute in.

05 Agricultural RWA: From “Malu Grapes” to Rural Upgrading

The returns on high-value agricultural products are not low, and the policy regulatory tolerance is very high.

  1. Land tenure difficulties → use equity SPV + agricultural REITs to avoid crossing the red line.
  2. High-value crops (wild ginseng, Chinese medicinal materials, agarwood, dried tangerine peel, etc.) + warehouse receipts/purchase long-term agreements → income rights financing.
  3. Rural cultural tourism + landmark brand on-chain → allowing global capital to buy “scenery + returns + ESG.”

Agricultural RWA provides incremental stories, opening a new track of “green finance + rural revitalization” for Hong Kong.

06 Infrastructure Strategy: Create the “Asia-Pacific On-Chain Asset List”

Build RWA infrastructure for Web2.5 using the approach of Web3.0 infrastructure.

· HKD stablecoin - linking to the internationalization of the Renminbi (reserve asset - offshore Renminbi), becoming the settlement anchor for the Hong Kong dollar;

· Layer2 public chain - supporting the tokenization of Hong Kong stocks and RWA infrastructure;

· Licensed Trading Platform Alliance DEX - Establish a liquidity alliance, share market making depth, and bridge Hong Kong stocks with crypto stocks;

· OTC & Custody - Connecting institutional cold wallets, family offices, and offshore funds for financial institutions in Hong Kong;

· DePIN+AI Agent - Abandon the erroneous path of “digitalization - on-chain - tokenization” and directly generate on-chain distributed assets based on infrastructure, forming a traceable distributed asset data network.

07 Future Roadmap: From “Copying Homework” to “Creating Exam Questions”

08 Conclusion: Hong Kong RWA will not fail, but the path needs to be reconstructed.

The failure lies not in the concept, but in the single-threaded “debt issuance-financing logic.” If Hong Kong wishes to maintain its status as a new financial center in the era of RWA, it must upgrade from “replicating Wall Street” to a three-dimensional battlefield of “integrating mainland assets + offshore funds + on-chain infrastructure.” When HKD stablecoins, Layer 2 settlements, and cross-domain ATS take shape, Hong Kong will transform from a “follower” into a “hub for on-chain assets in the Asia-Pacific,” truly completing, deepening, and expanding the RWA narrative.

Statement:

  1. This article is reprinted from [BLOCKBEATS] The copyright belongs to the original author [Ye Kai] If you have any objections to the reprint, please contact Gate Learn TeamThe team will process it as quickly as possible according to the relevant procedures.
  2. Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not constitute any investment advice.
  3. Other language versions of the article are translated by the Gate Learn team, unless otherwise mentioned.GateUnder such circumstances, it is prohibited to copy, disseminate, or plagiarize translated articles.
Start Now
Sign up and get a
$100
Voucher!